p. 1−6
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 7−18
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 19−30
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 31−40
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 41−49
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 51−64
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 65−79
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 81−89
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 91−98
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 99−105
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 107−115
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 117−125
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 127−134
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 135−147
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 149−160
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 161−171
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 173−179
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 181−193
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 195−206
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 207−215
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 217−220
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 221−230
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
Braconidae by 9.10% > both of Euritomidae and Trichogrammatidae by 7.27% > Eupelmidae by 3.64% > both of Bethylidae and Chalcididae by 1.82%. The role of biological and chemical control procedures used to manage olive pests was determined. Parasitism of certain parasitoid species on the main olive arthropod pests was investigated. The impact of chemical and safe alternative compounds to reduce olive pests and their associated natural enemies has been discussed in more details. ]]>
p. 231−242
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 243−251
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 253−262
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 263−276
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 277−285
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 287−301
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 303−309
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 311−322
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 223−233
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 235−250
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 251−25
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7
p. 257−276
2090-0813
Vol.10/No.7